Hybrid Work in Singapore: What Employees Expect in 2026 (And Where Employers Get It Wrong)

This article is written in English for readers in Singapore. Chinese and Japanese translations are available on our website. 

Introduction: Hybrid Work Is No Longer a Perk

Many Singapore employers still treat hybrid work as a benefit that can be adjusted, negotiated, or withdrawn when business needs change.

In 2026, workforce data suggests hybrid work has crossed a threshold.

For most employees, hybrid work is no longer viewed as a perk. It is an expectation. What has changed is not whether hybrid work exists, but how it is designed, communicated, and experienced in practice.

Insights from the Beyond the Pay Cheque: Singapore Employee Sentiment Study 2026, developed in collaboration with Rakuten Insight, show that employees are not asking for unlimited flexibility. Instead, they are asking for predictability, clarity, and fairness.

Hybrid Work Is the Default Expectation for Many Employees

The study confirms that hybrid work preferences are now mainstream.

• 61.7% of Singapore employees indicate a preference for hybrid work arrangements
• Only a minority express a strong preference for fully onsite or fully remote roles

This reflects a broader shift in how employees organise their working lives. Hybrid work allows employees to balance productivity, collaboration, and personal responsibilities more effectively.

However, preference alone does not guarantee satisfaction. The data shows that frustration arises not from the presence of hybrid work, but from how inconsistently it is applied.

Employees Want Predictability, Not Vague Flexibility

A key insight from the study is that employees value predictability over freedom.

Contrary to popular assumptions, employees are not demanding complete autonomy over when and where they work. Instead, they want:

• Clear expectations around in-office days
• Consistent application across teams
• Advance notice of changes
• Alignment between policy and manager behaviour

Hybrid arrangements fail when they are framed as “flexible” but operate unpredictably. When employees cannot plan their weeks with confidence, hybrid work becomes a source of stress rather than support.

Where Employers Commonly Get Hybrid Work Wrong

The study highlights several recurring pain points in hybrid implementation.

Hybrid work tends to break down when:

• Policies exist but are loosely enforced
• Decisions depend heavily on individual managers
• In-office expectations change frequently
• Employees receive mixed messages about flexibility

These issues are not usually intentional. They often arise from a lack of alignment between leadership intent and day-to-day management practice.

For employees, however, inconsistency quickly erodes trust.

Why Weekly Experience Matters More Than Policy Statements

Employees evaluate hybrid work based on weekly experience, not written guidelines.

They pay attention to practical realities:

• Are meetings scheduled with hybrid participation in mind?
• Are remote days respected, or interrupted by ad-hoc onsite demands?
• Are performance expectations adjusted for hybrid arrangements?
• When hybrid policies look progressive on paper but feel chaotic in practice, dissatisfaction grows. This explains why some organisations struggle with engagement despite offering hybrid options.

Hybrid Work and Retention Are Closely Linked

Hybrid work is no longer just a productivity or wellbeing issue. It is a retention factor.

The study shows that hybrid dissatisfaction often coincides with broader disengagement:

• Employees begin browsing roles quietly
• Commitment weakens before performance drops
• Retention risk emerges without obvious warning signs

This aligns with wider job-search behaviour:

• 71.8% of Singapore employees are engaged in some form of job-search activity

Hybrid inconsistency is frequently cited as one of the factors prompting employees to reassess their options.

Why Hybrid Work Is Harder to Get Right in 2026

Several factors make hybrid implementation more complex today:

• Leaner teams and heavier workloads
• Increased cross-functional collaboration
• Greater reliance on digital tools
• Higher employee sensitivity to fairness and trust

Employees are more aware of how hybrid work is handled elsewhere. Comparisons are frequent, and tolerance for ambiguity is lower than in earlier phases of hybrid adoption.

What This Means for Singapore Employers

For employers, the findings point to a shift in focus.

Hybrid work success is less about policy design and more about execution and management capability.

High-performing organisations:

• Set clear and stable expectations
• Equip managers to lead hybrid teams effectively
• Communicate changes transparently
• Align workload and performance measures with hybrid realities

Hybrid work must be designed as part of the role itself, not layered on as an informal arrangement.

What This Means for Line Managers

Line managers play a critical role in how hybrid work is experienced.

Employees respond positively when managers:

• Apply policies consistently
• Respect agreed working patterns
• Communicate expectations clearly
• Focus on outcomes rather than visibility

Where managers are unsupported or unclear, hybrid work becomes uneven and frustrating, regardless of formal policy.

What This Means for Singapore Professionals

For employees, the data highlights the importance of asking the right questions.

When evaluating hybrid roles, professionals should look beyond policy wording and assess:

• How hybrid arrangements operate in practice
• Whether expectations are stable and predictable
• How managers support flexible working
• How performance is measured in hybrid settings

Hybrid work works best when clarity replaces assumption.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is hybrid work still considered a benefit in Singapore?

For many employees, hybrid work is now an expectation rather than a benefit. What differentiates employers is how clearly and consistently it is implemented.

Do employees prefer full remote work?

Most employees prefer hybrid arrangements over fully remote or fully onsite models, balancing flexibility with collaboration.

Why do hybrid arrangements fail?

Hybrid arrangements often fail due to inconsistent application, unclear expectations, and lack of manager capability.

Does hybrid work affect retention?

Yes. Poorly implemented hybrid work can accelerate disengagement and increase retention risk, even when compensation is competitive.

 

Thinking About Hybrid Work in 2026?

Hybrid work is no longer about offering flexibility. It is about designing roles that employees can navigate with confidence and clarity.

For Employers
If you are reviewing your hybrid work approach or redesigning roles for 2026, speak with Reeracoen to understand what Singapore employees expect — and how to avoid common implementation pitfalls.

👉 Design better roles with Reeracoen Singapore

For Professionals
If you are considering a hybrid role and want to assess how flexibility works in practice, register for a confidential career discussion with our consultants.

👉 Start a confidential career conversation with Reeracoen Singapore

🔗 Related Articles (Singapore)

• Why Paying More Is No Longer Enough to Retain Talent in Singapore
• Would You Take a Pay Cut for Better Work-Life Balance? Singapore Employees Say “It Depends”
• Beyond Salary: Unique Employee Benefits in Singapore That Attract and Retain Talent

📚 References

• Reeracoen × Rakuten Insight, Beyond the Pay Cheque: Singapore Employee Sentiment Study 2026
• Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Singapore — Labour Market Insights
• Reeracoen × Rakuten Insight, APAC Workforce Whitepaper 2025

 

✅ Final Author Credit
By Valerie Ong, Regional Marketing Manager, Reeracoen Group
Published by Reeracoen Singapore, a leading recruitment agency in APAC.

 

 

Disclaimer:

The information provided in our blog articles is intended for general informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. 

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, the ever-evolving nature of certain topics may result in content becoming outdated or inaccurate over time. Therefore, we recommend consulting with qualified professionals or experts in the respective fields for specific advice or guidance. Any actions taken based on the information contained in our blog articles are solely at the reader's discretion and risk. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for any loss, damage, or adverse consequences incurred as a result of such actions.

We may occasionally provide links to external websites or resources for further information or reference. These links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content or accuracy of these external sources. Our blog articles may also include personal opinions, views, or interpretations of the authors, which do not necessarily reflect the views of our organisation as a whole. We encourage readers to verify the accuracy and relevance of information presented in our blog articles and to seek professional advice when needed. Your use of this website and its content constitutes acceptance of this disclaimer.